By Cheryl Edwards
In the most far-reaching changes made to the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) in over 15 years, the government has moved to, amongst other matters, triple corporate OHS penalties and quadruple individual OHS penalties, which has been effective as of Dec. 14.
The amendments are made in a bill titled the Stronger, Fairer Ontario Act (Budget Measures), 2017 (Bill 177).
Here are the key changes :
•Tripled corporate OHS fines. From 1990 forward, the maximum corporate penalty under the Ontario OHSA for a violation of the act or regulations has been $500,000 per charge. As of Dec. 14, corporations are now liable to a fine of not more than $1,500,000 per charge. A surcharge of 25 per cent, required under the Provincial Offences Act, is in addition to those penalties.
•Quadrupled individual OHS fines. Previously, any individual, including a supervisor, worker, director or officer, was liable to a maximum penalty under the Ontario OHSA of $25,000 per charge and/or one year in jail. Effective Dec.14, individuals are liable to a fine of not more than $100,000 per charge for a contravention of the OHSA or its regulations, in addition to a potential jail term. A surcharge of 25 per cent, required under the Provincial Offences Act, is in addition to those penalties.
•Limitation period for charges expanded. The limitation period for bringing a prosecution under the OHSA or its regulations has historically been one year from the date of the alleged contravention. Now, the limitation period includes the day upon which an inspector becomes aware of the alleged offence. This results in the possibility that if an inspector becomes aware of circumstances providing a foundation for an alleged OHS contravention, even if it occurred more than one year ago and even before this historic change, a charge could be commenced. Further, this could potentially create issues about what sentencing regime will apply.
•New reportable incident for structural inadequacy. An employer must now notify a minister of labour director if a joint health and safety committee or a health and safety representative identifies potential structural inadequacies of a workplace as a source of danger or a hazard to workers. Note that this obligation does not apply to an employer that owns the workplace.
•Further reportable incidents may be added to regulations. Bill 177 provisions amending the OHSA allow for passage of further regulations to specify additional prescribed locations in which employers or other parties are required to report an accident or other incident under section 53 of the OHSA, other than a project site or mine at which certain reportable events such as explosions, fires, floods, equipment failure, must now be reported. Section 53 of the OHSA has also been amended to clarify the persons who are obligated to give notice, in a new section 53(2).
•Potential further expansion to content and timing of reportable injury notices. The bill also allows for regulations to specify additional notice requirements that must be met where a person is killed or critically injured at a workplace; where a person is disabled or requires medical attention because of an accident, explosion, fire or incident of violence at a workplace; and where an accident occurs at a project site or mine. This may result in requirements for further details and particulars of investigations and corrective action to be statutorily required in accident reports in the foreseeable future.
Cheryl Edwards is a former occupational health and safety prosecutor with almost 30 years of experience. She can be reached at (647) 777-8283 or email@example.com
, or visit www.mathewsdinsdale.com
for more information.