MP criticizes new Work Reintegration program, WSIB responds

Written by  COS staff 13 April 2011
The new program recently implemented by Ontario's workers' compensation board to ensure early and safe return for injured workers is taking the flak from critics at Queen's Park, but the WSIB says some of the statements made at Question Perio were inaccurate.

The Workplace Safety and Insurance Board’s new Work Reintegration Program is stirring up controversy at Queen’s Park as questions about retraining of injured workers came up during Question Period on Monday.

Paul Miller, MPP for Hamilton East-Stoney Creek, questioned the WSIB’s new program saying it brings up the same problems as the Labour Market Re-entry program — which has been replaced by the Work Reintegration Program.

“The WSIB planned and implemented its new program, then decided to hold public consultations on it completely counter to normal practice and basic sense,” Miller said.

In statement, however, the WSIB refuted Miller’s claim saying that consultations were held prior to the implementation of the Work Reintegration Program.

“In fact, the WSIB did extensive consultation with Ontario workers, employers and their representatives before the Work Reintegration program was developed. The WSIB considered feedback gathered from the 2008 Morneau Sobeco report on Experience Rating, the 2009 KPMG Value for Money Audit, and the results of Chair Steve Mahoney's 2009 Stakeholder Consultation sessions,” the statement said.

The WSIB also consulted with the Ontario Network of Injured Worker Groups and the Canadian Federation of Independent Business.

The agency is currently reviewing submissions and recommendations from worker and employer groups as part of the policy consultation process, which will be considered for when the WSIB finalizes the policies around the Work Reintegration program, the WSIB said.

Miller also made reference to injured workers being retrained only to Grade 9 level, which the WSIB countered.

According to the WSIB statement, the agency has forged an agreement with 24 Ontario community colleges to provide upgrading, when required, beyond grade 9, as well as certificate and diploma programs. “Any academic upgrading or training is provided to help the worker achieve the vocational goals set out in an individualized Work Transition plan. These plans are developed with the worker's participation and input.”

The WSIB’s new Work Reintegration Program provides policies relating to early and safe return to work of injured workers.
Last modified on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 14:51

comments  

 
+5 #4 C. Johnson 2011-10-19 18:35
They give you schooling , yes. But only give a few help with job experience. Guess if you kiss butt then they will give you the job experience.They are discrimitory about this.If you have no experience in jobs then most places won't hire you .If they do then you have to tell them you have restrictions,,n ext thing you know you don't have a job.WSIB tells you your schooling is your experience..If you work outside your restrictions and reinjure yourself you're not covered along with legal complications. WSIB still cuts your benifits down or cuts you off altogether. People in jail or on welfare actually eat and live better than the injured worker and in most cases are treated better.And forget about getting meds for any other afflictions you may have .This is not even taken into consideration.Go try to find a job where you can't see because you need eyewear or having your teeth fixed that are falling out of your mouth ,just go get a job looking like a homeless person.see who will hire you
Quote
 
 
0 #3 Frank Mucci 2011-04-15 15:03
Comments from Employer interests prove to be fascinating.

How ironic that the WSIB is finally directing accident employer responsibility of placing injured workers back into environs of familiarity; and not setting them up for failure through the present format of LMR policy and procedures. (see - too many security guards)

Employer interests should be in the realm of safety.

Employer opportunity and interest is manifest in the initial stages of a claim. Through appropriate and responsible investigation, the employer can proceed in manner of disagreeing with any decision by the WSIB. (i.e. Appeals, Tribunal)

When this practice is played out, and the final determination is concluded whereby the claim has merit - do the due diligence.

The WSIB has it right this time.
Quote
 
 
+1 #2 Lisa Granger 2011-04-15 08:51
I agree Gary. Employers have to take a stand and voice their concerns. There was not enough input or feedback from employer groups. Next week the WSIB is holding some open forums in various locations in Ontario giving the employers a chance to voice concerns and recommendations . Any employer having concerns should send representatives to a meeting. See the following website for location and times. http://www.wsibfundingreview.ca/consultation-details.php
Quote
 
 
+1 #1 Gary Robertson 2011-04-14 15:17
Yes, in the eyes of the WSIB they did no wrong. First they tell everyone what they intend on doing, then they do it, then they ask for feedback on what they did.

Employers are tired of having it done to them too often.

Ultimately it is injured workers who will suffer when the whole system collapses. The Ontario WSIB is not sustainable and it is time to revisit the historic compromise.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

 

Reader Poll
Should Canada impose a total ban on manufacturing and exporting of asbestos products?