Labour inspectors set their eyes on PPE

Written by  COS staff 24 October 2011
Ministry of Labour inspectors will focus on personal protective equipment at Ontario workplaces in the industrial and health care sectors as part of the ministry's October enforcement blitz.
According to a news release by the ministry, inspectors will focus on hazards involving the choice, use and maintenance of PPE. "Workers using inappropriate or poorly maintained equipment are at risk of injury and illness," the ministry said.

Personal protective equipment acts as a barrier to guard workers against hazards such as blows to the body, loud noise, heat, chemicals and infection. The equipment includes protective clothing, helmets, shoes, goggles, respirators and other safety gear worn by workers.
Background

Thousands of workers have lost time at work due to incidents that could have been prevented if they wore proper personal protective equipment, according to the labour ministry.

In 2010, 1,075 workers suffered injuries that, in some cases, caused temporary or permanent vision loss due to impacts with objects. In that same year, 1,515 workers suffered head injuries due to impacts with objects and 1,120 workers suffered foot injuries caused by crushing, puncturing or dousing with hazardous substances. In many cases, the injured workers were wearing improper eye, head or foot protection or no protection at all, the ministry said.

Workers need to wear personal protective equipment when they are at risk of:
  • eye injury due to possible flying particles, dust, vapours, chemicals or intense light sources;
  • head injury due to possible falling or flying objects, fixed object blows or exposed energized electrical conductors; or,
  • foot injury due to possible falling or rolling objects, sharp objects or exposed energized electrical conductors.
Ministry of Labour inspectors will pay particular attention to workplaces in the following sectors:
  • Wood & metal fabrication
  • Vehicle sales and service
  • Food & beverage
  • Wholesalers
  • Education
  • Hospitals
  • Long term care homes
  • Homes for residential care (retirement homes)
In industrial workplaces, inspectors will focus on head, eye and foot protection. They may also address other types of personal protective equipment, including fall, respiratory, skin and hearing protection.

In health care workplaces, inspectors will focus on head, eye, face, respiratory, hearing, hand and foot protective equipment for non-clinical staff in dietary, housekeeping, maintenance, central sterile supply and laundry departments.

Inspectors will take enforcement action, as appropriate, for any contraventions found under the Occupational Health and Safety Act and its regulations, the labour ministry said.

During inspection, ministry inspectors will focus on the following key priorities:

Selection: Inspectors will check that employers and supervisors’ selection of personal protective equipment is appropriate for the hazard. They will also check that the equipment is providing an appropriate level of protection for the worker. For example, inspectors may ask supervisors why a particular type of equipment is being used as opposed to other types.

Use: Inspectors will check that employers and supervisors are instructing workers on the proper use of required personal protective equipment. They will also check that workers are using the required personal protective equipment.

Care: Inspectors will check that employers and supervisors are properly maintaining the required personal protective equipment. They will also check on the state of repair.
Last modified on Monday, 24 October 2011 10:49

Comments   

 
-2 #1 Dave Bennett 2011-10-29 09:00
Here we go again with another "bash the worker" initiative from the MOL. If this is like any other "blitz" in Ontario, it will only result in more $200 tickets handed out to workers and little done to unscrupulous employers and supervisors who choose to not do their jobs. The concept of the Internal Responsibility System that James Hamm proposed in 1976 has been watered down to nothing more than lip service by successive right-wing labour ministers who have never been in a workplace or understand what SAFETY really means. It has been too easy to download the responsibility of a worker's safety onto the worker by loading them up with more and more PPE (something that should be used a stop-gap or emergency measure only) that is in essence a sad excuse for employers to shirk their responsibilitie s.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh



It's a man's world: A day in the life of a safety professional http://t.co/hl4syyGZhb via @cosmagazine
Supreme Court shoots down random alcohol testing at N.B. plant http://t.co/sIY386cDv4 via @cosmagazine #safety #randomtesting
Safety Tip — Overhead Powerlines: http://t.co/lesY9YAVNP
VIDEO: Safety Tip - Overhead powerlines. #Safety tips from #Electrical Safety Authority http://t.co/auI49WXvod via @COSmagazine
Weaver of hope: The Threads of Life story http://t.co/F66ifGGgcL via @cosmagazine #safety @threadsoflifeca #ShirleyHickman
Reader Poll
Should mental health be part of the employer's OHS obligations?